🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined an organized professional network test this week following popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."