🔗 Share this article

Picture this: a happy the Danish striker wearing Napoli's colors. Now, juxtapose it with a dejected the Slovenian forward in a Manchester United kit, appearing like he's missed an open goal. Don't bother finding a real picture of him missing; context is your adversary. Then, add some goal stats in a large, silly font. Don't forget the emojis. Post it everywhere.

Will you point out that Højlund's tally features strikes in the premier European competition while Sesko isn't playing in Europe? Certainly not. Nor will you note that four of Højlund's goals came against weaker national sides, or that Denmark is far superior to Slovenia and creates far more chances. You manage online for a large outlet, raw interaction is your livelihood, Manchester United are the prime target, and context is your sworn enemy.

So the cycle of content spins. The next job is to sift through a lengthy interview featuring Peter Schmeichel and extract the part where he calls the acquisition of Sesko "strange". There's a bit, where Schmeichel prefaces his remarks by saying, "Nothing negative to say about Benjamin Sesko"... yes, remove that part. No one wants that. Just ensure "weird" and "Sesko" are paired in the headline. People will be outraged.

This Time of Potential and Hasty Opinions

Mid-autumn has long been one of my preferred times to observe football. Leaves fall, the wind turns, squads and strategies are still fresh, all is novel and yet everything is beginning to form. Key players of the season ahead are planting their flags. The transfer window is shut. No one is talking about the multiple trophies yet. All teams are still in the game. At this precise point, all is possibility.

However, for many of the same reasons, this period has also been one of my least favourite times to read about football. For while no outcomes are decided, opinions must be formed immediately. The City winger is resurgent. The German talent has been a major letdown. Could Semenyo be the best player in the league right now? Please a decision immediately.

The Player as The Prime Example

And for numerous reasons, Sesko feels like the archetype in this context, a player inextricably trapped between football's two countervailing, non-negotiable forces. The need to delay definitive judgment, to let layers of technical texture and tactical sophistication to develop. And the imperative to produce permanent verdicts, a conveyor belt of opinions and memes, out-of-context criticisms and pointless contrasts, a square that can never truly be solved.

It is not my aim to offer a substantive analysis of Sesko's time at Manchester United so far. He has started four times in the top flight in a highly unpredictable team, scored two goals, and had a grand total of 116 touches. What exactly are we evaluating? And will I attempt to replicate Gary Neville's and Ian Wright's seminal masterwork "The Sesko Debate", in which two famous analysts argue thrillingly on a popular show over whether Sesko needs 10 goals to be a success this season (one pundit), or whether it's really more like twelve or thirteen (the other).

A Cruel Environment

Despite this I enjoyed watching Sesko at Leipzig: a powerful, screeching sports car of a striker, playing in a team pitched perfectly to his abilities: given the license to attack but also the leeway to miss. Partly this is why Manchester United feels like the most unforgiving place he could possibly be right now: a place where "harsh judgments" are handed down in roughly the duration it takes to watch a short advertisement, the club with the largest and most ruthless gulf between the time and air he needs, and the opportunity he is going to get.

We saw an example of this during the international break, when a viral chart handily informed us that the player had been judged – decisively – the poorest acquisition of the summer transfer window by a survey of 20 agents. And of course, the press are by no means the only ones in this. Team social media, influencers, anonymous X accounts with a suspiciously high number of fake followers: all parties with a vested interest is now basically aligned along the same principles, an ecosystem explicitly nosed towards provocation.

The Mental Cost

Endless scrolling and tapping. What is happening to ourselves? Are we aware, on any level, what this endless stream of irritation is doing to our minds? Quite apart from the inherent strangeness of being a player in the center of this, knowing on some surreal chain-reaction level that every single thing about players is now essentially content, product, open-source property to be packaged and exchanged.

And yes, partly this is because it's Manchester United, the corpse that continues to feed the cycle, a major institution that must constantly be generating the big feelings. However, partly this is a temporary malaise, a pendulum of judgment most clearly and harshly glimpsed at this season, about a month after the window has closed. Throughout the summer we have been coveting players, eulogising them, salivating over them. Yet, only a handful of games later, a lot of those very players are now being dismissed as failures. Should we start to worry about Jamie Gittens? Did Arsenal actually need their striker necessary? What was the purpose of another expensive buy?

The Bigger Picture

It feels appropriate that Sesko meets Liverpool on the weekend: a team simultaneously on a long unbeaten run at their stadium in the Premier League and somehow in their own situation of feverish crisis, like submitting a missing person’s report on a person who popped to the shops 30 minutes ago. Defensively suspect. Their star past his prime. The striker an expensive flop. Arne Slot bald.

Perhaps we have failed to understand the way the storyline of football has started to replace football the actual game, to inflect the way we watch it, an entire sport reoriented around discussion topics and immediate responses, an activity that occurs in the backdrop while we browse through our phones, unable to disconnect from the constant flow of opinions and more takes. It may be this player bearing the brunt right now. However, we're all losing something in this process.